Legal Opinion
Luster v. Five Star Carpet Installations, Inc.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided February 25, 2000No. Docket No. 213351PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSaad, J.
Plaintiff appeals by leave granted from the opinion and order of the Worker’s Compensation Appellate Commission (wcac) affirming the magistrate’s denial of disability benefits. We affirm.
I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Plaintiff sought worker’s compensation benefits from Five Star Carpet Installations, Inc. (hereafter defendant), after he sustained a disabling knee injury while laying carpet on an assignment from defendant. Plaintiff maintained that he was defendant’s employee and therefore entitled to benefits under the Worker’s Disability Compensation Act, MCL 418.101 et seq.-, MSA 17.237(101) et…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hoste v. Shanty Creek Management, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Edelberg v. Leco Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Yerkovich v. AAAMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Amerisure Insurance Companies v. Time Auto Transportation, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Williams v. Cleveland Cliffs Iron Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McCAUL v. MODERN TILE AND CARPET, INCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- Adair v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Chicago Insurance v. Chimnee Cricket, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Chrysler Corp. v. Silicosis, Dust Disease, & Logging Industry Compensation FundMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Luster v. Five Star Carpet Installations, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.