Legal Opinion
City of Chisago City v. Holt
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 8, 1985No. C5-84-813PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Judge.
This is a condemnation action. The court awarded damages to respondents Holts in the amount of $121,557.53 for land taken by the appellant Chisago City. The City appeals from the denial of its motion for a new trial or, in the alternative, for amended findings of fact and conclusions of law. It alleges that the court improperly considered evidence bearing on value. The Holts seek review of the original judgment, alleging that they were entitled to greater damages. We affirm.
FACTS
The Holts own a parcel of land located in Chisago County, Minnesota, consisting of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hendrickson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- State v. Hayden Miller Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- City of St. Louis Park v. EngellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Johnson Bros. Grocery, Inc. v. State, Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- City of St. Louis Park v. Almor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
3Cited by8 opinions
- Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. AndaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. StromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Spannaus v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Caponi v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- County of Anoka v. Maego, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.