State Ex Rel. Spannaus v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
In a trial de novo following a condemnation award, the trial court excluded evidence of access to the frontage road from the remainder property on the basis that right of access to the remainder property was questionable. The State of Minnesota appeals on the basis that right of access was sufficiently certain so that the exclusion of the evidence denied the state a fair trial. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
FACTS
The State of Minnesota began this condemnation proceeding in 1981, pursuant to plans for improving the frontage road which services the south side of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hendrickson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Burnquist v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Connolly v. Nicollet HotelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- King v. Minneapolis Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- State v. Gannons Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Sebree v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- Grossman Investments v. State Ex Rel. HumphreyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. Delany, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
- Grossman Investments v. State Ex Rel. HumphreyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.