Legal Opinion
Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. Anda
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 2, 2010No. A07-1918, A07-1930PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, PAUL H., Justice.
In March 2001 the Moorhead Economic Development Authority (MEDA) exercised its condemnation power to take Roger W. Anda’s commercial property as part of a redevelopment project. The project area included Anda’s property and more than 20 other nearby properties. After taking title to and possession of Anda’s property through a quick-take procedure, MEDA and the property’s developer, Moorhead Holiday Associates (MHA), discovered fuel-oil contaminated soil on Anda’s property and two adjoining properties. Under contractual time pressure to deliver Anda’s property…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. Commodities Trading Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Lubbers v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. HannukselaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Oanes v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Domagala v. RollandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. AliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- 260 North 12th Street, LLC v. State of Wisconsin Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- State of Minnesota v. Renee Anita VaskoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Frazier v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.