Legal Opinion
Caponi v. Carlson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 26, 1986No. CO-86-44PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
This appeal is from a trial court’s determination that the City of Eagan did not take appellant Anthony Caponi’s land for use as a storm water holding pond without compensating him. Caponi contends the city’s action in designating a portion of his property as a storm water retention pond and the subsequent operation of the pond constitute a taking in violation of the U.S. Constitution, amend. V, and Minn. Const, art. 1, § 13. Respondents filed notices of review claiming that (1) by requesting a bifurcated trial and proceeding on the taking issue, Caponi waived his claim…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nolan and Nolan v. City of EaganCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Love v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- LOS ANGELES CTY. METRO. TRANSP. v. Continental Dev.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Continental Development Corp.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Shane Feldhaus v. City of MinnetonkaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024