State v. Hayden Miller Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order denying a new trial in a highway condemnation proceedings. Two tracts are involved, one is owned by the respondent Hayden Miller Company and the .other is owned by the respondent Kruse Company. The appellant, State of Minnesota, claims that the verdicts are excessive and not justified by the evidence and that there was prejudicial error in the court’s instructions and misconduct on the part of certain members of the jury.
It appears from the record that the property involved in these proceedings is located in an area where there has been…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Minneapolis-Saint Paul Sanitary District v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- State v. PahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- People ex rel. NunnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Grenz v. WerreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
- Weber v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Olberg v. Minneapolis Gas CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. StromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- McNally v. WalkowskiNevada Supreme Court · 1969
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.