Legal Opinion

City of St. Louis Park v. Engell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 2, 1969No. 41332, 41782PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, Justice.

Petitioner-appellant, the city of St. Louis Park, a municipal corporation, exercised its right of eminent domain pursuant to Minn. St. c. 117 to acquire for public use:

“* * * [A]n easement for street purposes * * * in, on, over and across [the lands involved herein described as Parcel 3, 1 and other lands] for the purpose of building, constructing, reconstructing and improving a public street and to thereafter maintain same within the corporate city limits of said municipal corporation.”

The names of parties interested in Parcel 3 and the nature of their interest are as follows:

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. City of Bloomington v. PollockIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  3. In Re Assessment for Improving Superior StreetSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Leopold v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  5. State v. Hayden Miller Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. E-470 Public Highway Authority v. 455 Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of WindomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Continental Sales & Equipment Co. v. Town of StuntzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Appeal of Ewert v. City of WinthropSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. E. H. Willmus Properties, Inc. v. Village of New BrightonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API