Legal Opinion

County of Anoka v. Maego, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 19, 1996No. C5-95-1584, C7-95-1585PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

Anoka County (the County) constructed a median down the center of University Avenue. This resulted in appellants Blaine State Bank (the Bank) and FinaServe, Inc. (Fina), occupants of abutting property, no longer having direct access to southbound traffic lanes. The County also brought eminent domain actions to take portions of the Bank’s and Fina’s property in order to widen the road, for which the latter were awarded condemnation damages. The Bank and Fina appealed the awards to the district court. The district court granted partial summary judgment to the County,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Uselman v. UselmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Hendrickson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. Minneapolis-Saint Paul Sanitary District v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  5. State v. Gannons Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. County of Anoka v. Blaine Building Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. County of Anoka v. Blaine Building Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API