Legal Opinion
Mobil Oil Corp. v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 19, 1994No. 12512PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The intervening defendants appeal from the trial court’s judgment sustaining the plaintiff’s zoning appeal. The plaintiff, Mobil Oil Corporation, filed an application for a special exception under the zoning regulations to allow for the conversion of an existing full-service gasoline station into a self-service station with a snack shop.
The named defendant zoning board of appeals of the city of Bridgeport (board) denied the application, and the plaintiff appealed to the Superior Court. The trial court granted a motion by neighboring property owners, Stuart Rosenberg and William McCarthy, to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Burnham v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Maloney v. PacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Rose v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Carten v. CartenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Jaser v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Pelliccione v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Conetta v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Osborne v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Cockerham v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.