Legal Opinion

Osborne v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 14, 1996No. 13889PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStoughton, J.

The defendant John T. Conroy1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the plaintiffs’ appeal from the decision of the zoning board of appeals of Guilford (board) granting the defendant a variance of a setback requirement.

The defendant claims on appeal that the trial court (1) based its conclusion that the granting of the variance was barred by the self-created hardship rule on a finding that was unsupported by the evidence, and (2) improperly failed to recognize a good faith exception to the self-created hardship rule under the facts of this case. Because we agree with the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pollard v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Stankiewicz v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  3. Stankiewicz v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Tianti v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. Kulak v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Children's School, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of StamfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  2. Durkin Village Plainville, LLC v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  3. Morikawa v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of WestonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  4. Beaver Dam Lake Assn. v. Bd., Zo. App., No. Cv98 034 93 87 S (May 27, 1999) Ct Page 5629Connecticut Superior Court · 1999
  5. Durkin Village Plainville, LLC v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API