Legal Opinion
Jaser v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 12, 1996No. 15247PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the plaintiffs’ appeal and reversing the decision of the defendant Milford zoning board of appeals (board) that the plaintiffs did not suffer a hardship and were not entitled to a variance. The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court impermissi-bly substituted its judgment for that of the board. We find that it did. We reverse the decision of the trial court.
*546The relevant facts are as follows. The plaintiffs, George Jaser, Nicholas Mainero and Jacob Mallin, own property located at 182 Milford Point Road in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Adolphson v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Devaney v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Chevron Oil Co. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Town of Westport v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Horace v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Moon v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Norwood v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Stancuna v. Zoning Board of Appeals of WallingfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Megin v. ZONING BD. OF APP. OF NEW MILFORDConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.