Legal Opinion
Pelliccione v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 17, 2001No. AC 20361PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HEALEY, J.
The defendant planning and zoning commission of the town of Ridgefield (commission) appeals from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the appeal by the plaintiff, Vincent Pelliccione, from the commission’s denial of his resubdivision application.1 On appeal, the commission contends that the court improperly (1) concluded that its denial of the plaintiffs resubdivision application was unsupported by the record and (2) substituted its judgment for that of the commission. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Burnham v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Irwin v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Smith v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. DelgadoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Doyen v. Zoning Board of Appeals of EssexConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Raymond v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- 200 Associates, LLC v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Azzarito v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.