Legal Opinion

Interstate Realty & Improvement Co. v. Clark

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 26, 1926No. Docket No. 5559PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.

Plaintiff sued to quiet title to certain real property situated in Los Angeles County. The defendant answered, setting up in haec verba a tax deed from the state covering the same property. The plaintiff did not controvert the deed by affidavit or further pleading and the parties went to trial on the complaint and answer. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff upon findings that the tax deed was void on its face, and from the judgment the defendant has appealed on a typewritten record.

The tax deed was executed on July 21, 1922, and recited that the property was regularly assessed for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Klumpke v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Bublitz v. ReevesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Hanson v. GoldsmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Bell v. BriganceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Trabue Pittman Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. City of Los Angeles v. WattersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Stoneman v. FritzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Western Loan & Building Co. v. BandelIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
  5. W. C. & A. N. Miller Development Co. v. Emig Properties Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API