Legal Opinion

Bell v. Brigance

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 2, 1925No. Docket No. 5181PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Action to quiet title. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff the defendant has appealed under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure.

The respondent has interposed a motion to affirm the judgment. That motion is based on the ground that the appellant has not complied with the statutory provisions in making a record. In the view we take of the case it will not be necessary to pass on the motion.

It will be remembered that prior to 1895 it had been the law…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tully v. BauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hall v. ChamberlainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Scott v. BeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Interstate Realty & Improvement Co. v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. Redman v. NewellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Hall v. ChamberlainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API