Bublitz v. Reeves
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.
This was an action by plaintiff to quiet title to a parcel of land in the city of Pasadena, county of Los Angeles. The defendant Reeves was the only defendant answering the complaint. By his answer he denied plaintiff’s title, and claimed title in himself under a state tax deed from the tax collector of Los Angeles County, set out in full in a pleading filed as a cross-complaint.
On the trial plaintiff introduced record evidence purporting to show chain of title from United States patent, through ' mesne conveyances, to himself, and rested. The defendant Reeves moved for nonsuit on the ground…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Peters v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Davis v. CrumpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Warring v. FreearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Lowe v. San Francisco & Northwestern Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Biaggi v. RamontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Stoneman v. FritzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Engleman v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Interstate Realty & Improvement Co. v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Gelberg v. ConsoloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.