Legal Opinion
City of Los Angeles v. Watterson
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 8, 1935No. Civ. 1376PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARDEN, J., pro tem.
On August 7, 1923, the electors of Owens Valley Irrigation District voted to issue bonds of said district in the amount of $1,650,000. On January 23, 1924, the board of directors thereof adopted a resolution authorizing the sale of bonds of said issue amounting to $736,000. On the date fixed for the reception of bids, February 14, 1924, a bid for bonds of the par value of $471,500 was presented in the name of M. H. Lewis & Company by C. A. Sheedy, vice-president, under circumstances hereinafter stated. Accompanying the bid was a cashier’s check of $8,400 to apply as part…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Berka v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- McClure v. Township of OxfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Stockton Plumbing & Supply Co. v. WheelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- City of Oakland v. Oakland Water Front Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Holm v. BramwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Miller v. City of MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Pruett v. BurrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Stoneman v. FritzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- City of Stuart v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.