Legal Opinion

Moore v. Copp

California Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1897No. Sac. No. 212PublishedCited by 109 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Placer County. J. E. Prewett, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Action to quiet title to certain land on which was a granite quarry. Defendant answered the complaint and set up an instrument executed by plaintiff to him September 25, 1889, by which plaintiff agreed to sell and convey to defendant-*431the portion of the land containing said quarry, at the expiration of a certain lease, under which the quarry was being worked, which did not expire until 1901. The consideration of the contract was one dollar paid and one thousand dollars to be paid at the expiration of said lease. Plaintiff did not serve and file an affidavit denying the contract. A…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. In re the Estate of GarcelonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Sterling v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Wetherly v. StrausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Burris v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Taylor v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Parchen v. ChessmanMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Kelley v. Hodge Transportation SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API