Legal Opinion
Ruane v. City of San Diego
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 21, 1968No. Civ. 9101PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.
Plaintiff, a taxpayer, appeals from a judgment denying injunctive and declaratory relief premised on the alleged invalidity of certain phases of the acquisition and operation of a transportation system by defendant, a chartered city.
The ease was tried upon an agreed statement of facts dated March 22, 1967, and three amendments thereto dated, respectively, April 12, 1967, June 14, 1967, and September 14, 1967.
The parties to the transaction which is the subject of the instant controversy, are the defendant, the City of San Diego; San Diego Transit System, a corporation, hereinafter referred to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McBean v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- West Coast Advertising Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- City of Grass Valley v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Orosi Public Utility District v. McCuaigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- City of Los Angeles v. OffnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- City and County of San Francisco v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- City of San Diego v. RiderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Miller v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Allstate Leasing Corp. v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- Allstate Leasing Corporation v. Board of County Commissioners, Rio Arriba County, New Mexico, Allstate Leasing Corporation v. Board of County Commissioners, Santa Fe County, New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.