Legal Opinion

City and County of San Francisco v. Farrell

California Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1982No. S.F. 24177PublishedCited by 142 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

In 1978, the voters adopted Proposition 13 (now art. XIII A of the Const.), which places limitations on the taxation powers of *50state and local government. Section 4 provides, “Cities, Counties and special districts, by a two-thirds vote of the qualified electors of such district, may impose special taxes on such district, except ad valorem taxes on real property or a transaction tax or sales tax on the sale of real property within such City, County or special district.”1

In our recent decision in Los Angeles County Transportation Com. v. Richmond (1982) 31 Cal.3d 197 [182…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Gay Law Students Ass'n v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Gordon v. LanceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Cedars of Lebanon Hospital v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by142 opinions

  1. Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. GuardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Lazar v. Hertz Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999

137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API