Legal Opinion
Miller v. City of Sacramento
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 11, 1977No. Civ. 15618PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REGAN, J.
The City of Sacramento, by and through its city council, enacted Resolution No. 74-333 and Ordinance No. 3428, Fourth Series, creating the position of council budget analyst. A taxpayers’ suit was filed challenging the power and authority of the council to create the position in this manner. Subsequent to preliminary motions, plaintiffs filed a supplemental complaint alleging that the council had negotiated with a prospective employee, Brian Teller, to fill the new position, a contract of employment had been drafted and a special meeting scheduled for the purpose of approving…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Kugler v. YocumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- City of Grass Valley v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- San Joaquin County Employees' Ass'n v. County of San JoaquinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Ruane v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
3Cited by6 opinions
- Taylor v. CraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Lucchesi v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- John A. Canfield v. George M. Sullivan, James D. Dunn, Ronald A. Garzini and Fred JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. City & County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1985
- City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.