Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. Offner

California Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1942No. L. A. 18145PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIBSON, C. J. —

By this proceeding in mandamus the city of Los Angeles seeks to compel the respondent, as secretary of its board of public works, to post and publish notices inviting sealed bids for the construction and leasing to the city of a rubbish incinerator. The respondent demurred to the petition, contending that the proposed lease will create a municipal indebtedness or liability which will exceed in the year of its execution the income and revenue then available to the city in violation of article XI, section 18, of the state Constitution.

The Board of Public Works of the City of Los…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McBean v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Higgins v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. In Re City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Garrett v. SwantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Doland v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Dean v. KuchelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Gude v. City of LakewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. Rider v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. County of Sacramento v. Assessment Appeals Board No. 2California Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. City of Phoenix v. Phoenix Civic Auditorium & Convention Center Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1965

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API