Legal Opinion

City of Grass Valley v. Walkinshaw

California Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1949No. S. F. 18028PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

In this proceeding the petitioner, city of Grass Valley, seeks the writ of mandate to compel the respondent, its auditor, to extend on the city’s property tax rolls, in addition to the tax for general municipal purposes, a special levy *597of 63 cents to discharge the 1950 payments of interest and principal on bonded indebtedness. The controversy is submitted on an agreed statement of the case pursuant to sections 1138-1140 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

In 1921 the petitioner, then a city of the sixth class, adopted a freeholders’ charter (Stats. 1921, p. 1889) and thereby accepted the privilege…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Ayres v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. City of Austin v. NalleTexas Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Ralls County Court v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. West Coast Advertising Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. DeYoung v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Harman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. City of Glendale v. TrondsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Mallon v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Domar Electric, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API