Legal Opinion
City of San Diego v. Rider
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 30, 1996No. D025921PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HALLER, J.
In this case we determine whether a lease-back financing arrangement to fund improvements to San Diego Jack Murphy Stadium (stadium) is valid. Under this arrangement, (1) the Public Facilities Financing Authority of The City of San Diego (agency) will lease the stadium from The City of San Diego (city), construct the improvements to the stadium and finance the construction by selling bonds to the public; (2) the city will then lease the improved stadium back from the agency pursuant to a “facility lease"; and (3) the agency will repay bondholders from rent the city pays under…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
- Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Max Factor & Co. v. KunsmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- McBean v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- North Coast Business Park v. Nielsen Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States Golf Ass'n v. Arroyo Software Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Lachapelle v. Toyota Motor Credit CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Beroiz v. WahlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Carter v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- San Diegans for Open Government v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.