Legal Opinion
In re Brigitte L. Adams
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 30, 2018No. 16-BG-370PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
*1116 In 2015, a Hearing Committee ("Committee") of the Board on Professional Responsibility ("Board") determined that Brigitte L. Adams ("Respondent") violated multiple Rules of Professional Conduct when she neglected the cases of five Criminal Justice Act ("CJA") clients. The Committee recommended respondent be suspended from the practice of law for six months and that her reinstatement be conditioned on proof of her fitness to practice law.
The Board agreed with a substantial majority of the Committee's findings and conclusions; however, the Board disagreed with the Committee's recommended…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In Re CaterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re HallmarkDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re TempleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In re MartinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- In Re PeekDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re Abigail AskewDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
- In re Dobbie & In re TaylorDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
- In re GonzalezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024
- In re Larry KlaymanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020