Legal Opinion
In re Fox
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 23, 2013No. 10-BG-1630Published
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Associate Judge:
In this reciprocal discipline proceeding against respondent David E. Fox, the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) recommends that we impose a two-year suspension with conditions. Bar Counsel argues that respondent should receive the identical reciprocal discipline of disbarment. We adopt the Board’s recommendation.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
On December 20, 2010, the Maryland Court of Appeals disbarred respondent from the practice of law. Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Maryland v. Fox, 417 Md. 504, 11 A.3d 762 (2010). This sanction was based upon…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- In Re CaterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Matter of SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- In Re GarnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- In Re CorizziDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.