Legal Opinion

Sen v. Employment Department

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 19, 2008No. 06AB1966; A134482PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Claimant seeks judicial review of an order of the Employment Appeals Board (EAB) that denied claimant unemployment benefits on the ground that he voluntarily left work without good cause. ORS 657.176(2)(c). We review the order to determine whether substantial evidence supports EAB’s findings of fact, ORS 183.482(8)(c), and to determine whether there is a rational relationship between those findings and EAB’s legal conclusion, Young v. Employment Dept., 170 Or App 752, 755, 13 P3d 1027 (2000). We affirm.

The material facts, as found by EAB, are as follows: For several years, claimant worked as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Dennis v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Brotherton v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  5. Young v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marella v. Employment Department & Concorde Career Colleges, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. Roadhouse v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. Dubrow v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. Dubrow v. Employment Dept.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API