Legal Opinion

Marella v. Employment Department & Concorde Career Colleges, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 15, 2008No. 07AB0480; A135366PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Employment Appeals Board (EAB) that disqualified her from receiving unemployment benefits for a specified period of time because she refused an offer of suitable work without good cause. The issue raised here is whether the EAB erred, both factually and legally, in determining that claimant did not have good cause to refuse to accept a position because it did not provide health benefits. We review for errors of law and substantial evidence, ORS 183.482(8)(a) and (c), and affirm.

The EAB adopted the following facts:

“(1) Claimant filed a claim for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Application of Portland General Elec. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Brotherton v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  4. Larsen v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. Sen v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Entrepreneurs Foundation v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. Lavelle-Hayden v. Employment Dept.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  3. Dawson v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. Lavelle-Hayden v. Employment Dept.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API