Legal Opinion

Brotherton v. Morgan

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 20, 1974No. 74-984PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

Claimant seeks judicial review of a decision of the Employment Appeals Board affirming the denial of unemployment benefits by the referee and the Administrator of the Employment Division. Claimant was disqualified on the ground that he “left work voluntarily without good cause.” ORS 657.176 (2). Because claimant moved to Oregon after he left his employment, two referee hearings were held, one in Longview, Washington, and one in Salem, Oregon. Claimant appeared and testified at the Salem hearing only.

Claimant was employed as a truck driver. On Thursday, June 28,1973, he was tardy in reporting…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stevenson v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  2. James v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Cameron v. DeBoardOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. In re the Claim of BerkowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  5. Von Poppenheim v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. McPherson v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Rogue River Packing Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1976
  3. McDowell v. Employment DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Garrelts v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  5. Chamblee v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API