Legal Opinion

Simonds v. Shaw

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 8, 1997No. 15145PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.

The defendants appeal from the trial court’s decision rendering judgment for the plaintiffs in accordance with the report of the attorney trial referee. On appeal, the defendants claim that the trial court improperly (1) granted an injunction, (2) found an easement by prescriptive use by the plaintiffs and their predecessors in title, (3) found that a right-of-way is appurtenant to the plaintiffs’ property, (4) determined that the plaintiffs had met their burden of proving that a right-of-way exists, (5) found that there had not been an abandonment of any right-of-way that may have existed,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. PierceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  2. Expressway Associates II v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Kuras v. KopeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. Reynolds v. SofferSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. Schulz v. SyvertsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gallo-Mure v. TomchikConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  2. Hoffer v. Swan Lake Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Faught v. Edgewood Corners, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. St. Germain v. HurdConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  5. First Union National Bank v. Eppoliti Realty Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API