Legal Opinion

State v. Pierce

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 11, 1981PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFRESNE, Active Retired Justice.

The defendants, Rexford Pierce and Sandra Van Buren, appeal from their convictions of gross sexual misconduct, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 253(2)(B) (Supp.1980), 1 a Class C crime. Van Burén, the mother of the pros-ecutrix, was convicted as an accomplice under 17 — A M.R.S.A. § 57(3)(A) (Supp.1980). 2 In case docketed Sag-80-6, both defendants challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support their convictions, argue that the indictments upon which they were tried were fatally defective, and claim that the trial court’s denial of their motions for separate trials…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. State v. DoughtySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  4. State v. CharetteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1963
  5. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Sutton v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  2. State v. JoySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  3. State v. WalkerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  4. State v. MichaudSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  5. State v. SpearinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API