Hoffer v. Swan Lake Ass'n
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The plaintiff in this action to quiet title appeals from the trial court’s judgment rendered in favor of the defendant after the court found that the plaintiff did not possess a prescriptive easement across a road owned by the defendant. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly found that his past use of the area in question was by permission, rather than under a claim of right, thereby precluding a finding of a prescriptive easement. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
*859The relevant facts briefly are as follows. The plaintiff, John M. Holler, owns contiguous lots within a…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Klein v. DeRosaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Libby v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- McNeil v. RiccioConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- County of Westchester v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Zavisza v. HastingsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- Boccanfuso v. ConnerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. YusufConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. StevensonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Gallo-Mure v. TomchikConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. RiserConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.