Legal Opinion

Kuras v. Kope

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 24, 1987No. 13107; 13108PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.

These appeals involve the disputes concerning an easement by prescription in favor of Walter and Helen Kope over a right-of-way, approximately 1900 feet long, on real property in Suffield owned by Chester and Sarah Kuras. A Superior Court *334judgment in 19821 decreed that the Kopes’ predecessors' in title, Ara and Martha Dildilian, had established an easement by prescription over a dirt road on the Kurases’ property and in doing so, it enjoined the Kurases from interfering with the Kopes’ right to use the right-of-way. In 1984, the Kurases brought an action against the Kopes in which they sought…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Big Cottonwood Tanner Ditch Co. v. MoyleUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Gibbens v. WeisshauptIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Guillet v. LivernoisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Hanson Development Co. v. East Great Plains Shopping Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Ventres v. Goodspeed Airport, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. Smith v. MuellnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. TB of Blythesville, Inc. v. Little Rock Sign & Emblem, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Lakeview Associates v. Woodlake Master Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  5. Castonguay v. PlourdeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API