Legal Opinion

Schulz v. Syvertsen

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 28, 1991No. 14206; 14207PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCovello, J.

This is an action to quiet title with respect to a disputed beach accessway that may cross the defendants’ real property on Old Sachem’s Head Road, Guilford. The trial court concluded that some of the plaintiffs had acquired an easement by prescription over the defendants’ land and that *83others had not. The issues presented on appeal are: (1) whether the trial court committed harmful error in considering the applicability of the Marketable Title Act, General Statutes § 47-33b et seq.; (2) whether the prescriptive use of the accessway was adverse under a claim of right; (3) whether the trial…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Town of Brookfield v. Candlewood Shores Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. Wadsworth Realty Co. v. SundbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  3. Robinson v. MyersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  4. Reynolds v. SofferSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. Wildwood Associates, Ltd. v. EspositoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Ventres v. Goodspeed Airport, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. Il Giardino, LLC v. Belle Haven Land Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. Boccanfuso v. ConnerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  4. Coughlin v. AndersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  5. Kelley v. TomasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API