Legal Opinion

First Union National Bank v. Eppoliti Realty Co.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 20, 2007No. AC 27120PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERS, J.

The issue in this appeal is whether a court’s grant of an easement by pecessity must specifically describe the scope of such an easement. The owner of the servient estate claims that, in granting an easement over his property for “all general purposes,” the court improperly created an easement that, in effect, gave the owner of the dominant estate unlimited use of the easement. We agree and direct the trial court, on remand, to fashion a proper remedy.

On February 13, 2003, the plaintiff, First Union National Bank (First Union), 1 filed a three count complaint against the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hollywyle Assn., Inc. v. HollisterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  2. State v. Robert H.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  3. McBurney v. CirilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  4. Bolan v. Avalon Farms Property Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. State v. RodriguezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sanders v. DiasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  2. Christensen v. ReedConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  3. St. Germain v. HurdConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  4. Francini v. Goodspeed Airport, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  5. Metroplitan District v. MottConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API