Legal Opinion

Oliver v. Sperry

California Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1934No. Docket No. Sac. 4789PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

—J. E.. Oliver, the surviving husband of Harriet A. Oliver, deceased, brought this action to partition certain, real property in San Joaquin County owned in part by the deceased wife in her lifetime. An interlocutory decree was entered which determined the right of the respective parties and ordered partition as follows: One-fourth interest to J. E. Oliver; one-fourth interest to Charles Elmer Miller, son by a former marriage and only surviving issue of Harriet A. Oliver, deceased; and one-half interest to Carrie Evelyn Sperry. Charles Elmer Miller appealed from the interlocutory decree,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pista v. ResetarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Ryer v. Fletcher Ryer Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Gutierrez v. HebberdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Oliver v. SperryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. MALATKA v. HelmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Riley v. TurpinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Balkins v. NorrbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Cathcart v. Redlands Security Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API