Ryer v. Fletcher Ryer Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an interlocutory judgment of the Superior Court of Solano County in an action for partition, A. J. Buckles, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
—This action was brought by plaintiff, as administratrix of the estate of William T. S. Ryer, deceased, against the defendant corporation for the purpose of having the lands described in the amended complaint partitioned according to the respective rights of the plaintiff as such administrator and of defendant corporation.
A demurrer was interposed by defendant to the amended complaint, and overruled. The defendant then answered, and after trial an interlocutory judgment or order was entered ordering the property to he partitioned in certain proportions, and appointing referees to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gates v. SalmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Bath v. ValdezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Roach v. CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Throckmorton v. PenceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Campau v. CampauMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Peck v. WatsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Honsinger v. StewartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- Murphy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Belakjon v. HilstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
- Vasiljevich v. RadanovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.