Legal Opinion
MALATKA v. Helm
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 29, 2010No. H032417PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUSHING, P. J.
I. Introduction
Plaintiff Aviva Malatka has obtained an order restraining one of her neighbors, defendant Christine Helm, from verbally harassing her and her husband. (Code Civ. Proc., § 527.6.) The initial order was filed on May 18, 2007, after hearings on April 20 and May 18, 2007. An amended order adding plaintiff’s husband was filed on June 12, 2007.
Rather than appealing from the restraining order, defendant filed a motion to dissolve or modify it. After a hearing on September 25, 2007, the court modified the restraining order, implicitly denying the request to…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- LiMandri v. JudkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Nwosu v. UbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Freeman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Duronslet v. KampsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Epstein v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People Ex Rel. Feuer v. Progressive Horizon, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Wong v. Wong (In re Loy Tim), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Ansari v. Khan CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.