Legal Opinion

Cathcart v. Redlands Security Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 18, 1945No. Civ. No. 3280PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Plaintiff and respondent brought this action to partition certain real property under the provisions of *593section 752 et seq. of the Code of Civil Procedure. It is alleged that plaintiff and defendant Redlands Security Company, a corporation, hereinafter referred to as the company, are the owners as tenants in common of the real property described in the complaint; that plaintiff is the owner of a three-fourths interest and that defendant company is the owner of a one-fourth interest therein; that defendants are in possession thereof; that on February 20, 1931, plaintiff executed to defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lent v. HC Morris Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Cathcart v. GregoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Deacon v. DeaconCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Holt v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Wernse v. DorseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cohen v. KarubianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API