Cathcart v. Redlands Security Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
Plaintiff and respondent brought this action to partition certain real property under the provisions of *593section 752 et seq. of the Code of Civil Procedure. It is alleged that plaintiff and defendant Redlands Security Company, a corporation, hereinafter referred to as the company, are the owners as tenants in common of the real property described in the complaint; that plaintiff is the owner of a three-fourths interest and that defendant company is the owner of a one-fourth interest therein; that defendants are in possession thereof; that on February 20, 1931, plaintiff executed to defendant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lent v. HC Morris Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- Cathcart v. GregoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Deacon v. DeaconCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Holt v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Wernse v. DorseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cohen v. KarubianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969