Legal Opinion

Riley v. Turpin

California Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1960No. S. F. 19971PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

In this suit for the partition of real property plaintiff appeals from certain portions of an “Order Allowing Attorneys’ Fees to Both Parties.” We have con- eluded that plaintiff’s attacks upon such order are without merit, and that it should be affirmed.

Defendant owned a life estate in the subject real property, and plaintiff and defendant owned contingent remainders dependent upon which one of them survived. Plaintiff, by paying real property taxes which were the obligation of the life tenant, was subrogated to the tax lien. He sued for partition. An interlocutory judgment was entered…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Lynch v. BirdwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Cucinella v. Weston Biscuit Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Capuccio v. CaireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Capuccio v. CaireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Towers, Perrin, Forster & Crosby, Inc. v. B. Peter Brown and David F. RidingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  2. Johnston v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  3. Orien v. Lutz, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. Stine v. Diamond (In Re Flynn)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Orien v. LutzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API