Legal Opinion

Oliver v. Sperry

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 1929No. Docket No. 3674PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

This action was instituted to secure a decree of partition of certain real property, the plaintiff, J. E. Oliver, claiming an undivided one-quarter interest therein as surviving husband and heir at law of Harriett A. Oliver (née Miller), deceased.

The complaint sets forth that at the time of her death Harriett A. Oliver (née Miller) was the owner of an undivided one-half interest in and to the property described in the complaint; that the appellant, Charles Elmer Miller, was the surviving son and only child of the said Harriett A. Oliver; that the plaintiff and respondent, J. E. Oliver, was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. De Vries v. De VriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  2. Miller v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Hall v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. Lehner v. McLennanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Oliver v. SperryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API