Legal Opinion

Pista v. Resetar

California Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1928No. Docket No. S.F. 12441PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

This action was instituted for the purpose of partitioning certain ranch property and determining the respective interests of the parties in and to the growing crops thereon. Upon submission of the cause after trial and with consent of all parties expressed in open court, an interlocutory decree was entered by which said property was duly partitioned and divided, 82/100ths thereof to appellant and 18/100ths thereof to respondent. Said decree further adjudged and determined that there was due, owing, and unpaid from respondent to appellant, representing appellant’s 82/100ths of the income and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Title Ins. Trust Co. v. Calif. Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Gray v. BekinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles City Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Hentig v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ochoa v. McCushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. R.G. Hamilton Corp., Ltd. v. CorumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Perry v. West Coast Bond & Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Riley v. TurpinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Oliver v. SperryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API