Syler v. Katzer
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.
Plaintiff brought an action to recover for the value of services performed by him to the decedent, H. G. Halkett, during his lifetime. The complaint alleged an implied contract for services which were to be continuously performed and were so performed from January 1, 1930, until the death of the decedent. (See Turell v. Anderson, 16 Cal. App. (2d) 445 [60 Pac. (2d) 906].) The answer denied the material allegations and pleaded the statute of limitations and statute of frauds as a defense. The court, sitting without a jury, found that the decedent had requested plaintiff to render such services…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Etchas v. OrenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- United States Gypsum Co. v. ShafferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Merrill v. KohlbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Standiford v. CantrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Estate of SteuerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Tabata v. MuraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Lundberg v. KatzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Barnett v. Hitching Post Lodge, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Toney v. Security First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Davey v. JansonArizona Supreme Court · 1944
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.