Legal Opinion

Chas. L. Harney, Inc. v. State of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 11, 1963No. Civ. 20884PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

The sole question for our determination on this appeal is whether the instant action brought on a claim against the state for work done and materials furnished for a highway project is barred by the provisions of section 644 of the Government Code. The court below concluded that it was. Plaintiff appeals from an order sustaining a demurrer to its second amended complaint without leave to amend and from the judgment of dismissal entered thereon. “ An order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend is nonappealable, and the appeal must be taken from the ensuing judgment.” (Lavine v. Jessup…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. People v. ValentineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Livermore v. BealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Olive Proration Program Committee v. Agricultural Prorate CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Lavine v. JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Addison v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. EH Morrill Co. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Petersen v. City of VallejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. People v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Stanley v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API