Chas. L. Harney, Inc. v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
The sole question for our determination on this appeal is whether the instant action brought on a claim against the state for work done and materials furnished for a highway project is barred by the provisions of section 644 of the Government Code. The court below concluded that it was. Plaintiff appeals from an order sustaining a demurrer to its second amended complaint without leave to amend and from the judgment of dismissal entered thereon. “ An order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend is nonappealable, and the appeal must be taken from the ensuing judgment.” (Lavine v. Jessup…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- People v. ValentineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Livermore v. BealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Olive Proration Program Committee v. Agricultural Prorate CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Lavine v. JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Addison v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- EH Morrill Co. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Petersen v. City of VallejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- People v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Stanley v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.