Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Hitching Post Lodge, Inc.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1966No. 7084PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOCKWOOD, Justice.

Plaintiffs (appellants herein) are Phillip Barnett and Pacific National Bank, as signee. - Defendants (appellees) are Hitching Post Lodge, a corporation, and the Bank of Douglas 1 as Executor of the estate of Ray Gilliland.

The plaintiff sought relief in two counts. The first count was for foreclosure of a mortgage in the sum of $108,000 executed by Gilliland encumbering the Hitching Post Lodge, a motel in Scottsdale, Arizona, title to which was in the name of Hitching Post Lodge, Inc., a corporation. This mortgage purported to be given to Barnett to secure a promissory note…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Titus v. . PooleNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. West Investment Co. v. MoorheadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. United States Gypsum Co. v. ShafferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Theisen v. KeoughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Crouch v. PixlerArizona Supreme Court · 1958

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Brown v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Matheson v. HarrisIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  3. England v. Ally Ong HingArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Jensen v. State Bank of AllisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  5. Ray Korte Chevrolet v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API