Legal Opinion

Lundberg v. Katz

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 5, 1941No. Civ. 11457PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $5,200, interest and costs. The action was brought by her against the administrator of the estate of Robert Hart Overton to recover the reasonable value of services performed as housekeeper and nurse for a period of more than sixteen years immediately preceding the death of decedent, the services being rendered at his special instance and request and upon his promise to pay therefor by bequest. The major question on appeal is the sufficiency of a claim filed with the administrator as the basis for a money judg ment. It is…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Estate of Dutard v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Etchas v. OrenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Mayborne v. Citizens Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Nathanson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Tabata v. MuraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Estate of ReinhertzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Seedborg v. Lakewood Gardens Civic Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API