Hill v. Den
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County. W. B. Cope, Judge. The facts are stated in tire opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
BELCHER, C.
This is an action to recover the alleged reasonable value of certain services performed by plaintiff’s wife, Maria Angustias Hill, for defendant. The defendant had judgment, and the plaintiff appeals on the judgment-roll.
*43The facts of the case, as disclosed by the findings of the court or admitted by the pleadings, are as follows: On or about the eighteenth day of April, 1894, defendant requested Mrs. Hill, plaintiff’s wife, to come to his, defendant’s, house, and take care of him and do the necessary work about and in the house, and agreed that he would support and maintain her…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Abbott v. DraperNew York Supreme Court · 1847
- Gates v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Fuller v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Wittenbrock v. BellmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Hammond v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Warder v. HutchisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Winkler v. JerrueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Gervaise v. BrookinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Bastjan v. BastjanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Engasser v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.