Legal Opinion

Fuller v. Reed

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1869PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth District, City and County of Sau Francisco. Upon the trial, when the plaintiff had introduced all his testimony, the defendant moved for a nonsuit, which was refused. The verdict and judgment was for -the plaintiff, and the defendant appealed. The case is-stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSprague, J.

The complaint in this case contains three distinct counts.

The first count is upon a specific contract, the terms of which, as alleged, are substantially that on or about the 6th of April, 1868, the defendant, being the owner of eight thou-six hundred and ninety-seven acres of land, located in Yolo County, this State, in consideration that plaintiff at the especial instance and request of defendant, undertook to find a purchaser for and negotiate a sale of eight thousand acres of said land at the price of $4,000, or such further sum as he could obtain therefor, promised and agreed to pay the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Card v. GrinmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1823
  2. Stuart v. DavidsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1823

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Spinney v. DowningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Roy v. SalisburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Jogani v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Dillingham v. DahlgrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. Paul v. Layne & Bowler Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API