Hammond v. Wallace
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
Plaintiff is the assignee in insolvency of Uhlhorn and Maples. On June 9,1884, he caused to be sold at public auction certain lands belonging to them, and the defendant Wallace became the purchaser, and in due time received a deed of conveyance. She after-wards sold and conveyed various portions of the lands to the other defendants. On November 18, 1885, about one year and a half after the sale, this present action was brought to set aside the sale, on the alleged grounds that the property was bid in at a grossly inadequate price, and that the defendant Wallace had conspired with…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bailey v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Gifford v. CarvillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Herman v. HaffeneggerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Donahue v. GallavanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Flanagan v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Kelley v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Schaff v. KennellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
- Sharp v. Mortgage Security Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Zeller v. MilliganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.