Legal Opinion

Warder v. Hutchison

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 20, 1924No. Civ. No. 2871PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiffs are husband and wife; that in the year 1907 they and David H. Hutchison, the above-named decedent, entered into an oral agreement providing that “in consideration of board, lodging and washing to be furnished to and done for said David H. Hutchison by plaintiffs” during his lifetime, he would convey to them certain real property and “would leave the instrument of conveyance thereof so that it could be delivered after his death”; that, “in pursuance of said agreement and not otherwise,” they furnished him “board, lodging and washing . . . continuously”…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Doolittle v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Mayborne v. Citizens Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Harper v. GoldschmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Hagan v. McNaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Long v. RumseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Tabata v. MuraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Leoni v. DelanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Buckley v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API