Winkler v. Jerrue
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL' from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. Paul J. McCormick, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.
This action is for money had and received by defendant for the use and benefit of plaintiff. The answer is a denial of the allegations of the complaint, and further alleging that the money so paid was on account of a cash installment of the purchase price of certain real property, alleged to have been sold by defendant to plaintiff; and further, that in such purchase plaintiff assumed a certain mortgage lien and agreed to make further and additional payments at a specified time, aggregating the sum of five thousand three hundred dollars; that pursuant to such agreement plaintiff took and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Loaiza v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Minor v. BaldridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Kofoed v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Backman v. ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Hill v. DenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- French v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Harris v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Craig v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Tracy v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.